Now that former President Clinton has endorsed Obama and says that he is ready to lead, we should believe him. Before, when he said that Obama was not ready to lead, we were supposed to believe him, or was that.. to not believe him?
Based on the headlines it is clear that MSN is convinced.
I wonder if we should take any politician seriously anymore? If we were supposed to worry about who would answer the phone at 3 am in the event of a national emergency before – why not now?
Did the world suddenly change in the last few months? If so, then Bush must have performed some miracle with his policies. If Bush’s policies are so good, then why not have them continued? If McCain = Bush, then I guess you should vote for McCain?
Why do people who look you in the eye and lie (both Democrats and Republicans) expect us to believe them now? Wouldn’t it be better to just wait until next week or month or year when they will tell us the real truth THEN?
Remember, “I did not have sexual relations with that woman… Ms. Lewinsky.” Not that anyone (besides the Mrs.) cared. You were under oath in a case against you for using your position to sexually harass female employees (not that NOW seemed to care). Months later, his story changed.
Please forgive me if I don’t respond in the trance-like state that MSN was in after gazing into your eyes and listening to your emphatic and passionate words.
Either you believe that Obama is prepared and will be better than McCain or you don’t. If you are waiting for marching orders from Bill Clinton then I ask the following question: who are the mind numbed robots? Democrats or those who listen to Rush Limbaugh?

August 28, 2008 at 4:52 am |
Bill Clinton speech – test skills for Obama !!!
While Bill Clinton’s speech on the third night of the convention will only be a courtesy accorded former presidents, Obama — who speaks tomorrow, the last night of the convention — needs his support desperately.